Event #1: Moving Old Files


As a celebrity judge, I'm not required to blog – I'm just here for my good looks :> -- but I'm having a great time reading the blogs posted by the Expert Judges about the Event #1 candidate solutions.  Much of the judging is subjective, but I'll add the criteria that I use to distinguish a working solution from a great solution.
Before I do, though, I want to congratulate everyone who submitted an entry. Most of the entries work and you probably learned just from playing with the challenge. Keep it up and come back year after year.
One hint to everyone: TEST! Most of the entries work, but many fail if the directory for the application (e.g. App1 in \\NASServer\Archives\App1) does not already exist. And, a few fail with regular expression errors on the Replace operator (more in the blog). There are lots of great test strategies, but you can just run your code on file in your own directories or step through the code in the Windows PowerShell ISE debugger.

Get-Help: An Archival Atrocity

Let's start with a quick review of the event challenge. You can read the beginner challenge here.
Basically, the task is to move log files older than 90 days old from their current locations in application-specific subdirectories of C:\Application\Log  (such as C:\Application\Log\<App-name>\<GUID>.log) to an archive share, \\NASServer\Archives.
The files have GUID filenames (read: you can't predict them). You need to maintain the subdirectory structure, so if a log file starts in the App582 subdirectory of C:\Application\Log, after the move, it should be in the App852 subdirectory of NASServer\Archives.
The final instruction/hint is that the applications generate the files and never touch them again. I'm not an expert, but I interpreted this to mean that the CreationTime property and the LastWriteTime property of these log files will be the same and you can use either in your solution. (Is that right?)
The advanced challenge involves the same task, but generalized into a reusable tool, so you want to create a script with parameters for the log path and archive paths. This is one of those advanced challenges that many beginners should be able to do. For giggles, try it on your beginner solution.
To recap, here are the elements of this challenge and solutions, all of which I think are acceptable in a beginner challenge.

  • Find the log files
  • Get only the ones that are at least 90 days old (CreationTime or LastWriteTime)
  • Move them to the same subdirectory in the archive directory

Finding the log files is pretty easy:

Get-ChildItem C:\Application\Log\*.log –Recurse
Get-ChildItem C:\Application\Log  -Include *.log  –Recurse
Get-ChildItem C:\Application\Log  -Filter *.log  –Recurse
Get-ChildItem C:\Application\Log\ *\*.log

Calculating 90 days is only a bit harder:

(Get-Date).AddDays(-90)     #Yes, a negative number!
(Get-Date).Subtract(New-TimeSpan -Days 90)
((Get-Date) - $file.LastWriteTime).Days -gt 90

Because the only really tricky part in this challenge is moving the file and maintaining the directory structure, I'm concentrating on that part.

  • First,  you need to get the current subdirectory and make sure the file goes in that same subdirectory in the new location.
  • Second, if you try to copy or move an item to a directory that doesn't exist, the command fails – and the Force parameter will not build the path for you.


Here are the elements that I look for in a solution.

  • Preserve the path:  I look for solutions that preserve or build the new path correctly. This is required by the challenge, but it's also a place for some creativity.
  • Test-Path/New-Item: I look for solutions that test to see if the path exists in the new location (Test-Path) and creates the directories in the path if they don't already exist, typically by using Mkdir (md) or New-Item –Type Directory.
  • New-Item | Out-Null:  When you create a new path, New-Item and Mkdir return a directory object. This can be confusing to users who run your script, so I give extra points for suppressing the output. I typically do this by piping the output to Out-Null. Here's a possible solution, but I'm open to creative variation.
    New-Item -Type Directory -Path C:\Application\Log\$p | Out-Null
  • Help (of course). More below
  • Test. Don't share a solution that you haven't tested. There are many ways to test, but running the solution on datasets with different elements is a great way. I always run my code in the Windows PowerShell ISE debugger before using it or sharing it.


All shared functions and scripts should have help. Help helps the end user and makes the script maintainable. Unless you plan a use a command once and toss it, you need help.
Comment-based help for a simple script like this is easy to write:

  By juneb 4/25/2013
  Moves files that are at least 90 days old from a
  subdirectory of C:\Application\Log to the same
  subdirectory in NASServer\Archives.

Additional comments are great, especially if you're doing something clever. For example, if you use the $Path.Directory.Name to get the path (thanks to Bartek Bielawski for this hint), a comment that it gets only the immediate parent directory would be very helpful to someone reading the script.
I actually deduct points for "help" that Get-Help can't get, such as this sort of stuff:

# This script moves files that are older than 90 days
# old from a subdirectory of C:\Application\Log to the
# same subdirectory in NASServer\Archives. I wrote it
# for Scripting Games 2013, Event 1

It's so easy to do it right that doing it wrong is pretty silly.

Efficiency: Calculating 90 Days

I've seen a lot of this approach in solutions, usually in one-liners.

Get-ChildItem C:\Application\Log\*\*.log |
    Where-Object {$_.LastWriteTime -lt (Get-Date).AddDays(-90)} |
    Move-Item -Destination ...

This approach recalculates the archive date FOR EVERY FILE. That would make sense only if the script took more than a day to run. Computers are pretty fast these days, but there's no reason to be purposefully inefficient. It's much better to calculate the archive date once, save it, and reuse it.

$ArchiveDate = (Get-Date).AddDays(-90)
Get-ChildItem C:\Application\Log\*\*.log |
   Where-Object {$_.LastWriteTime -lt $ArchiveDate} |
   Move-Item -Destination ...

Get-ChildItem: -File, -Directory -Hidden -ReadOnly, -Attributes

The FileSystem provider in Windows PowerShell 3.0 adds awesome new parameters to the Get-ChildItem cmdlet. For help, Get-Help Get-ChildItem for FileSystem. I give extra points to people who use them correctly and deduct points for the more old-fashioned PSISContainer.
The following code works:

Get-ChildItem C:\Application\Log -Recurse | Where-Object {$_.PSIsContainer}

But the preferred version uses the new features and it is really much easier to interpret:

Get-ChildItem C:\Application\Log -Directory -Recurse

On the same note, I noticed the following:

Get-ChildItem -Attributes D ...

Like a lot of solutions, this works -- it gets only directories in the path -- but it's more confusing than the simpler equivalent:

Get-ChildItem -Directory

The Attributes parameter is designed for attribute combinations and for attributes that cannot be expressed with the simpler parameters, like this expression, which gets files that are compressed and not hidden.

Get-ChildItem -File -Attributes Compressed+!Hidden

Regular Expressions in Replace Statements

One of the tricky parts of this challenge was preserving the original path in the new archive directory. There were many clever ways to do this. But several (presumably untested) solutions will fail with a regular expression error.
For example:

foreach ($file in $files)
    $newName = $file.fullname -replace 'C:\Application\Log','\\NASServer\Archives'
    move-item -Destination $newName

Generates this error:

Regular expression pattern is not valid: C:\Application\Log.
At C:\ps-test\ScriptingGames2013\Move-TestEsc.ps1:5 char:5
+     $newName = $file.fullname -replace 'C:\Application\Log','\\NASServer\Archive ...
+     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo          : InvalidOperation: (C:\Application\Log:String) [], RuntimeException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : InvalidRegularExpression

The problem here is that you didn't intend to supply a regular expression as input, but the Replace operator interprets the text that it is replacing (the first operand) as a regular expression. In this case, it interprets the backslashes as escape characters.  To resolve the error, escape the backslashes by doubling them, that is, preceding each backslash with another backslash.
For example:

-replace 'C:\\Application\\Log' ...

Here is the corrected code:

foreach ($file in $files)
    $newName = $file.fullname -replace 'C:\\Application\\Log','\\NASServer\Archives'
    move-item -Destination $newName

You don't need to escape the backslash in the replacement text (second operand), because the Replace operator doesn't interpret that text as a regular expression. It just pastes it.
NOTE: The Replace method of strings does not use regular expressions, so you don't need to worry about those backslashes.

$newName = ($file.fullname).Replace('C:\ps-test','\\NASServer\Archives')

Simplify Booleans

Here's a very frequent pattern:

if ($a -eq $true) {<do this>} elseif ($a -eq $false) {<do that>}

But notice that:

$a -eq $true

Is equivalent to:



$a -eq $false

Is equivalent to:


And, if $a is not true, the only alternative, is that it's false. So you can simplify that original code to:

if ($a) {<do this>} else {<do that>}

So, when you see yourself typing:

Where {$_.PSIsContainer -eq $true}

You can react immediately and change it to:

Where {$_.PSIsContainer }

Or change:

$_.PsISContainer -ne $True



A side note: In some languages, $a is true if it contains a true statement or any numeric value other than zero. In Windows PowerShell $a is true if it contains a true statement or a value of 1; otherwise, it is false.

Enumerating the paths

Many of the solutions included enumerated paths, like this:

Get-Childitem -Path "C:\Application\Log\App1", `
    "C:\Application\Log\OtherApp", `
    "C:\Application\Log\OtherApp" -Recurse ...

I feel badly, but I think these folks misinterpreted examples to be absolute paths. It's really important for us to write the challenges clearly and unambiguously, especially because we have a truly international audience, but participants need to read carefully, too.

Don't use aliases

Aliases are terrific for interactive commands and commands that you don't share with others. But for anything else, including the Scritping Games, avoid them. Can you imagine a beginner trying to intepret a solution in which "?" is used instead of Where-Object? How would the person search for that "?"?  Because understanding is the goal, I have no trouble with eliminating the "Object" in Where-Object, Sort-Object, Select-Object, but it's better to leave it in.
In general, you should also include the names of positional parameters, although I don't mind omitting the most frequently used ones. Other people might be pickier, but I don't use "Where-Object -Property" or "Get-ChildItem -Path" in my own code and I don't require it from others.


A final note: one-liners are very useful, but I don't count lines of code or characters in a command when evaluating solutions. Solutions that use fancy regular expression statements are impressive but they can be difficult to interpret and maintain. If you can get your code onto one line, that's terrific, but it's not necessary and I don't give it any extra points.
Now, we can get ready for Event #2. Good luck, everyone!

7 Responses to " Event #1: Moving Old Files "

  1. matttilford says:

    That was a fantastic post there June, it makes me wish i read it before submitting my code for event 2 (regarding adding help). But my question is in regards to using aliases. You said we shouldn’t use them in scripts in that is something i have taken away from my event 1 code. However we both used ! to represent -not. This is not on the list provided by get-alias which is where most people would look but it is an alias as shown is about_logical_operators. For clarity should we also avoid using that?

  2. June Blender says:

    Great question. I don’t think of ! as an alias for -Not, although it is equivalent. I think we added it as a peer to -Not because it’s used in so many other programming languages. Fair point, though. From now on, I’ll use -not.
    I mentioned aliases because we really want every solution to be a learning opportunity for the community, especially for beginners. If a beginner can’t interpret the solution, it doesn’t really help them.
    Good luck on Event 2 and beyond.

    • Hi June,
      I enjoyed reading your commentary on Event 1. I will say one comment about the use of “!” vs “-not.” In several cases, I have found myself reading through a script and missing the “!” because of its small footprint. Even though I use “!” in other languages, for the reason I just mentioned, I have begun trying to use “-not” exclusively. I still slip into “other language mode” sometimes, but it is a habit I am trying to break when I am in Powershell mode.
      Additionally, I found your thoughts on calculating the date in this event interesting. I had used the less efficient method you mentioned, but it makes perfect sense about calculating the date one time. I will try to keep that in mind on future scripts.

  3. Rob Campbell says:

    Just MHO, but I don’t really care for solutions that use Get-Childitem -Recurse.
    Better to use a nested loop to get the directories, and then get/move the files in each directory in an inner loop or pipeline using foreach-object.
    You have to test for and if necessary, create a targe directory for each source directory you’re archiving files from. If, for whatever reason you are unable to create that target directory then you cannot move any of the files from that source directory. With the nested loop, if creation of the target directory creation fails you can skip that source directory and move on to the next one.
    If you start with a recursive enumeration of the files and just iterate through that, you’ll be doing that test/create of the target directory over and over again for each file. If it fails to create the target directory and you report that error you’re going to paint the screen with potentally hundreds of essentially the same error message.

  4. June Blender says:

    Thanks, Jonathan. I’d never before considered that “!” could be a problem, but I agree that it’s a potential problem. I’ll add it to our internal example guidance. (That guidance used to be public, too. I’ll find out what happened to it.)
    Rob, I didn’t mean to imply that all directory enumeration is bad. If you can limit the scope of a recursive search, you’re absolutely right. I was just sad to see that some people interpreted the placeholders in the examples as real paths, e.g. ThisAppAlso. That’s just a communications problem, but it broke some solutions.

  5. GaryJ says:

    Thanks for the information. I’ve learned a lot just from this one article.

  6. imfrancisd says:

    Calculating the date once has the extra benefit that two files with the same age are both always moved, or both always not moved. This is because both files are compared to the same date/time.
    For example, let’s say that a.log was created a minute earlier than z.log and that the script takes a few hours to run. If the script recalculates the date/time for every file, a.log may not be old enough when the script gets to it, but z.log may be old enough when the script gets to it. This would mean that a.log stays and z.log moves, even though a.log was created a minute earlier than z.log. Things get worse if the creation times of a.log and z.log are only a few milliseconds apart. It would look like some files that are 90 days old are moved, and some are not, depending on when the script is run, how long it takes to run, and the order in which the files are processed.
    As for the ambiguity of the event, I thought that was just part of the tradition of Event 1. 🙂