I've testing out the judging system using the practice event and one thing jumped out at me.
It was a lot easier to understand the entries for those teams that included a transcript of their entry.
I would very strongly recommend that you include a transcript of your entry running. As a minimum I would recommend that you include:
- the solution running - show each type of input required by the scenario (pipeline, single values, file etc)
- if parameter validation is asked for - show that in action
- show error handling in action if you can
- show the partial contents of any output file
Transcripts make for happy judges. You want your judges to be happy don't you...