March 27, 2018 at 3:44 pm #97202
I am setting up PS Remoting with an IP address as my target. I know if you are using an ip for your computername parameter on enter-pssession, kerberos is not used. I also noticed in the documentation that NTLM authentication is used by default whenever you specify an IP address and -cred parameter for enter-pssession. My question: Is NTLM authentication trustworthy when using -cred parameter with an ip as a target when using enter-pssession or new-pssession?
HOW TO USE AN IP ADDRESS IN A REMOTE COMMAND
ERROR: The WinRM client cannot process the request. If the
authentication scheme is different from Kerberos, or if the client
computer is not joined to a domain, then HTTPS transport must be used
or the destination machine must be added to the TrustedHosts
The ComputerName parameters of the New-PSSession, Enter-PSSession and
Invoke-Command cmdlets accept an IP address as a valid value. However,
because Kerberos authentication does not support IP addresses, NTLM
authentication is used by default whenever you specify an IP address.
When using NTLM authentication, the following procedure is required
1. Configure the computer for HTTPS transport or add the IP addresses
of the remote computers to the TrustedHosts list on the local
For instructions, see "How to Add a Computer to the TrustedHosts
2. Use the Credential parameter in all remote commands.
This is required even when you are submitting the credentials
of the current user.
March 27, 2018 at 3:50 pm #97208
Depends on what you mean by "trustworthy." It doesn't really do mutual authentication, which is the whole point of Kerberos and/or HTTPS, so you're opening yourself to potential man-in-the-middle or spoofing attacks wherein you send your NTLM credentials to a bad actor. That's why the docs say to set up HTTPS.
March 27, 2018 at 4:57 pm #97221
If this is the @theRealDonJames- your books and youtube tutorials have helped me greatly, thanks for that also.
March 27, 2018 at 6:00 pm #97232
Sorry last question if you don't mind– signed cert ok?
March 27, 2018 at 6:04 pm #97235
You mean self-signed certificate? No, not okay. It wouldn't be trusted.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.