I don’t think posts should be closed

Welcome Forums Web Site Feedback & Assistance I don’t think posts should be closed

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    • #249605
      Topics: 32
      Replies: 842
      Points: 2,690
      Helping Hand
      Rank: Community Hero

      I disagree with posts being closed to new replies. Would Stackoverflow do that? Someone could come up with a better answer, or more good information.

    • #249908
      Senior Moderator
      Topics: 9
      Replies: 1311
      Points: 4,794
      Helping Hand
      Rank: Community Hero

      Sometimes I too had such thought. But so far there are no options to identify a thread as answered. Lets see other’s opinion.

    • #250151
      Topics: 2
      Replies: 32
      Points: 637
      Team MemberHelping Hand
      Rank: Major Contributor

      Hi JS, The topics will auto-close after 90 days of inactivity if I remember correctly. I will go back and check the settings to be sure. This cuts down on potential spam posts that have in the past overloaded our system.

    • #250154
      Senior Moderator
      Topics: 10
      Replies: 168
      Points: 899
      Helping Hand
      Rank: Major Contributor

      I close threads occasionally when the original question is pretty straightforward and the answer is simple enough that there isn’t a need for another one – such as this question about regex from last week. There’s no reason for this thread to be bumped with a new response.

      It would be useful if we could mark threads as having good answers the way stackoverflow does, but I think we’d have to write our own web code to support that. A simpler solution would be a new forum section that we could move answered threads to for future reference.

      Just to address this

      Would Stackoverflow do that?

      StackOverflow is a business with ~$55 million annual revenue and 300+ employees.

      PowerShell.org is supported by the DevOps Collective (a non-profit organization) and has ~5 active moderators (who are volunteers). We’re never going to be as feature-rich as StackOverflow… it’s just not possible.

      • This reply was modified 1 month, 1 week ago by grokkit.
Viewing 3 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.